Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Links one of companion identification attribute similarity, relationships onset, relationship quality, and you can like. [ Backlinks ]

Baxter, L. Good., & West, L. (2003). Couple thinking of the similarities and differences: Good dialectical direction. Record from Private and you will Societal Relationships, 20, 491-514. [ Hyperlinks ]

Berscheid, Age. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you will feeling. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible relationship (pp. 143-161). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Berscheid, Age., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Bodily appeal and dating choices: A test of coordinating theory. Journal of Experimental Societal Psychology, eight, 173-189. [ Links ]

Diary from Societal and private Matchmaking, 24, 479-496

Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Regan, P. (2005). This new therapy away from interpersonal dating. Upper Seat Lake, NJ: Pearson Studies (Prentice Hallway). [ Website links ]

Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Task results and you will attributional correspondence as the determinants out of social destination. Speech Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Links ]

Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and you can intimate dating. Into the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & Grams. Lindzey (Eds.), The newest handbook from social therapy (Vol. 2, last ed. Pp. 193-281). New york: McGraw-Hill. [ Website links ]

Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Could possibly get 11). You.S. Patent 6,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Backlinks ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, The fall of. 18). U.S. Patent eight,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Website links ]

Buss, D. Yards. (1984). Relationship range for character dispositions: Review which have about three various other studies offer. Behavior Family genes, 14, 111-123. [ Website links ]

Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude off positive and negative reinforcements just like the good determinant of interest. Journal of Identity and Personal Therapy, dos, 884-889. [ Website links ]

Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), To have modern-date Cupids, research changes relationship: Psychological science is actually behind the fresh new successful matches made at eHarmony. Association https://lovingwomen.org/sv/blog/slaviska-datingsajter/ for Mental Science Observer, 18. Installed away from [ Website links ]

Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Increasing lover options over the internet: A comparison out-of relationships quality ranging from marriage ceremonies as a result of an internet matchmaking program and marriages arising from unfettered selection. Interpersona: A global Diary to the Individual Matchmaking, step 3, 105-125. [ Backlinks ]

Carter, S., & Snowfall, C. (2004, May). Providing single men and women go into better marriage ceremonies playing with predictive type relationship triumph. Paper shown during the 16th Annual Convention of the Western Emotional Society. [ Backlinks ]

Approach and you will system to have distinguishing people who find themselves likely to enjoys a flourishing relationship

C). How come character count from inside the ination away from trait nervousness, negativity, and marital satisfaction. Diary away from Personality and you will Social Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Hyperlinks ]

Clark, M. S. (1985). Effects out of matchmaking particular for insights being compatible. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible relationship (pp. 119-140). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in dating aspiration and satisfaction that have computer system-establish lovers. Record off ily, 28, 62-66. [ Hyperlinks ]

Cooper, Good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Information online destination. Log of Sex Training and you may Medication, twenty two, 7-14. [ Website links ]

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Perform someone know what they want: An equivalent otherwise subservient lover? Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 595-602. [ Website links ]

Feingold, A good. (1988). Coordinating to possess elegance inside intimate lovers and you may same-sex nearest and dearest: A great meta-research and you may theoretical feedback. Mental Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from popular with appalling: Disenchantment having a romantic spouse. Sociological Perspectives, forty two, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]